ANSWER A SIMPLE QUESTION: IN 2026 WITH DAVID OR NICOLO?
The Republican Party’s new move in the process of expressing no confidence in Nicol has predictably inflamed passions in both the ruling and opposition camps.
And this is already a bitter pattern: the initially heterogeneous anti-Nikol pole, through no fault of ours, has turned into disparate cabinets promoting their own narrow interests.
The second president’s team seems to have divided the responsibilities among themselves: if heterogeneous and disparate figures were engaged in furious anti-propaganda, then the parliamentary faction responds in the spirit of more “procedural resistance”.
First about the “propagandists”.
Although the main target of criticism of Kocharyan’s propagandists in social networks and news was the head of the Masis community, David Hambardzumyan, nominated as a candidate for prime minister through impeachment, he was only an opportunity. The main reason for the violent reaction was the obvious and for some unexpected step of the Republican Party in the “impeachment” process: nominating a candidate for prime minister.
After all, the approach “impeachment is over, let’s calmly prepare for 2026” has already taken root among both Nikolyan’s supporters and the supporters of the Second President.
In this situation, whoever was nominated as a candidate, the bile and bile of various propagandists ready to eat his flesh would be the same. “Servants of order” who unnaturally roll their sly eyes and say “at least nominate Ashotyan or Sharmazanov”, I ask you to translate, real gentlemen and not much different from ladies.
On the day of the nomination of the candidate, one of the media outlets, I don’t know who, I don’t know who, but inadvertently conducted an investigative experiment by printing my name as a possible candidate for the post of Prime Minister of the Republic of Armenia. And a few hours later, the three-year-old scoundrels and tsuziki, who are part of the same opposition camp, began spreading the Turkish-language insults they had uttered against me in 2016. Come on, don’t tell me. You animals didn’t even realize that you were shouting at me, but you did it to all of us, including the country.
This fact proves that the name of David (I will address him separately) was just an excuse for them to show their inflamed nerves again.
I don’t like the tragicomedy “Waiting for the 26th”, my party doesn’t like it. There is still a year until 2026, and only God knows what kind of year this will be for our country. Or did you think that we would silently accept your decision not to nominate a candidate?
By the way. It is not too late. If you do not like David (or any other person we potentially nominate), take the initiative, suggest another name from your ranks, let’s work together, don’t you and we have such experience?
Nominating a candidate on our part is not a step towards claiming power, but towards achieving a change in power. Can you suggest another name to achieve this goal? If you cannot, then at least do not interfere, not to mention help.
And David is halal. His courage and determination are not ostentatious, they are practical, his patriotism is not whiny, he is tough. He is a Republican, but not a Republican, big and truly multi-layered with his environment. He has seen life and has been tempered by life. He is not perfect and in his imperfections he is a man, not polycarbonate.
He understands and is ready, unlike some who either do not understand, or, understanding, are not ready. He is national and courageous. David defeated the KP and, unlike other winners, he does not anoint them and does not work as an “oppositionist with a creeping schedule”.
He is ready to fight Nikol with the help of all of us, and you are fighting against him. Isn’t that shameful?
And frankly, I do not understand the position of the largest opposition faction. You both claim that we are politically responsible for the process, and you are also in a state of chaos. You both understand that there are no other mechanisms to reprimand Nikol at the moment, and you are not using to the full the levers that you have under “procedural” pretexts.
After all, we quietly and without fuss joined the previous attempts that you initiated, we did not fight for the stage, the podium and the loudspeaker, for the sake of noble goals, we even agreed to “be used, but not visible”. Isn’t it clear that as soon as you actually put your signatures on the form, the missing votes will be collected easier and faster. Isn’t it clear that those who watch from the sidelines will not join the process, even if the parliamentary opposition is not united? The practice of torpedoing the process with preconditions is incomprehensible, incomprehensible and unacceptable. And do not be surprised by the public reaction to this fact.
In fact, your lack of trust in us prevents you from expressing your lack of trust in Nikol. This is very sad, because over the years we have overcome much more serious and difficult tests together, forming a kind of fighting brotherhood. After all, as La Rochefoucauld said, not trusting your friends is more shameful than being deceived by them… 2026 will come again one way or another. Participate again, collecting
2025-06-13