Historical and legal facts that reveal the falsity of the Azerbaijan government and the CP-ists who support its theses. The ruling regime of Armenia, guided by Azerbaijani theses, recognized Artsakh as an integral part of Azerbaijan. But the reality is different: Artsakh is not an integral part of Azerbaijan, but is occupied by Azerbaijan. Abstaining from a political assessment, below I present historical and legal facts regarding false Azerbaijani theses. 1. Ancient historians Strabo and Dion Cassius mention Orchisthene, i.e. Artsakh, as an inseparable part of historical Armenia. 2. Pliny the Elder, Claudius Ptholomeus, Dion Cassius, Appianus and Strabo clearly state in their works that the border between Armenia and Aghvank passes through the Kur River. Therefore, even if we imagine for a moment that once the Caucasian Tatars � If the propaganda of today's Azerbaijanis has decided to take ownership of the Aghvan heritage, then I have to disappoint them here too, because, according to ancient historians, the historical states of Artsakh and Utik bordered Aghvan and the same ancient history. According to their testimony, they did not enter its geographical boundaries. I repeat: neither Artsakh nor Utik provinces have anything to do with the historical Aghvank, Bun Aghvank or Caucasian Aghvank. Aghvank was located on the left bank of the Kur River, and the right bank part of the Kur bordering Aghvank was an inseparable part of Great Hayk. 3. The state named Azerbaijan appeared on the political map of the world only in 1918. on May 27, as a result of the military intervention of the Turkish Nouri Pasha. 4. The international community did not even recognize 1918-1920. Democratic Republic of Azerbaijan. The League of Nations not only refused to officially recognize the Republic of Azerbaijan, but also did not accept the application of the Republic of Azerbaijan to join the League of Nations. 5. 1920 On December 1, the 5th Committee of the Assembly of the League of Nations recorded. The Republic of Azerbaijan has never been a state before and was included in larger powers, such as Mongolia /meaning the Mongol-Tatar rule/ or Persia, and since 1813 the Russian Empire. Azerbaijan Anum is nothing but the name of a neighboring Persian province, which was chosen as the name of the newly created republic. Thus, the League of Nations still existed in 1920. recorded a. Azerbaijan was a state until 1918. did not exist b. The name Azerbaijan is the escaped name of one of the Persian provinces c. It refuses to recognize the Democratic Republic of Azerbaijan as an international entity. Referring to the Nagorno-Karabakh issue, I should mention that disputes over it intensified during the period of the disintegration of the Russian Empire. 1918-1920 In Nagorno-Karabakh, legislative power was exercised through assemblies of Karabakh Armenians. The first congress was held in 1918. On July 22, Nagorno-Karabakh declares an independent administrative and political unit, electing a National Council and a government. Azerbaijan is trying to include Karabakh in its composition, but both the second and third congresses reject the Turkish troops. Yes, to join Azerbaijan. Similar decisions are also made in 1919. convened congresses. In order to avoid military conflicts in 1919 օգոստոսի 22-ին Ղարաբաղի հայերի 7-րդ համագումարը եւ Ադրբեջանի Դեմոկրատական Հանրապետությունը համաձայնագիր են կնքում , որի համաձայն Լեռնային Ղարաբաղի խնդիրը պետք է քննարկվի Փարիզի Խաղաղության կոնֆերանսում: Moreover, Gha� was not changed in the agreement �yard status. It should be noted that the signing of the agreement by the Azerbaijani government with the Assembly of Nagorno-Karabakh Armenians proves that the Republic of Azerbaijan recognizes Karabakh as an independent legal entity. However 1920 in March, the Azerbaijanis, violating the agreement, start military operations against Nagorno Karabakh. In such conditions in 1920 On April 23, the Congress of Karabakh Armenians declares Karabakh as an inseparable part of the Republic of Armenia. And on August 10, 1920, Soviet Russia and the Republic of Armenia signed an agreement, according to which the problem should be solved between RA and Khor. with the pact to be concluded between the Russian Federation. Let's record that in 1918-1920. Nagorno-Karabakh was never part of the Republic of Azerbaijan, and Azerbaijan was not even recognized by the League of Nations at that time. 1920 on November 30, the government of Soviet Azerbaijan adopts a declaration by which Nagorno-Karabakh, Nakhichevan and Zangezur become part of Soviet Armenia. And in 1921 On June 12, the National Council of the Azerbaijan SSR decided to recognize Nagorno Karabakh as an integral part of the SSR. Already in 1921 in July, the leadership of Soviet Azerbaijan proposes to discuss the issue of Karabakh's membership at the plenary session of the Caucasian Bureau of the Russian Bolshevik Party. The July 4 session rejects Azerbaijan's proposal. But the next day by an illegal decision, Nagorno Karabakh is annexed to the Azerbaijan SSR. The struggle for the self-determination of the people of Artsakh gained new momentum in 1988. According to the decisions of February 20 and July 12 of the same year, Nagorno Karabakh, according to the legislation of the USSR, left It was part of Soviet Azerbaijan, and in 1991 On September 2, Nagorno-Karabakh embarks on the process of independence by adopting the Declaration of Independence of the Republic of Nagorno-Karabakh. This process fully corresponded to 1990. to the corresponding legislation of the USSR adopted on April 3. 1991 On December 10, the Republic of Nagorno Karabakh held an independence referendum in the presence of international observers and mass media. For the information of falsifiers of historical and legal facts, I should mention that Lern ​​participated in the referendum vote 82.2 percent of registered voters in Karabakh, 99 percent of whom or 107,648 people said "yes" to the independence of Artsakh. Thus, Nagorno-Karabakh is the only autonomous region of the USSR that gained its independence under Soviet internal legislation. according to Therefore, Aliyev Jr.'s statements are not only devoid of facts, but also contempt for historiography and international law.