“Nicolas has a new mission: to deny the struggle for self-determination of the Armenian people, presenting the Karabakh movement as an ‘altar of foreign interests,'” wrote Artsakh National Assembly MP Metaxe Hakobyan.
“By the way, the movement began not with geopolitical games, but with the bloodshed of people fleeing Sumgait, Baku, and Kirovabad. If this is a ‘mistake,’ then it turns out that the attempt to protect these people was also wrong.”
Nicolas’s thesis: “We gave up our territory, therefore we lost sovereignty” is an inverted causality. In reality, it wasn’t the Karabakh movement that weakened Armenia’s sovereignty, but the country’s position as a result of Nicolas’s incompetent governance and defeatist policies.
According to Nicolas, if “the movement continues, it will be war.”
This is no longer a political choice; it is blackmail and terrorism against Armenians.” This formulation boils down to the following: “Either you renounce your rights, or I will unleash a new war on you.”
But in reality, politics always has a third option: protecting rights without outright war, through diplomacy, international platforms, and strengthening the state.
Finally, when Nikol calls the Declaration of Independence a “declaration of conflict,” it is already a revision of the ideological foundation of statehood, a declaration of the non-existence of the Republic of Armenia.
The Nikols have turned defeatism into state policy.
They must be held accountable for the disasters they have caused when the state is restored in our country, when the law is no longer elected, when the government is no longer protected by office, and when society is not satisfied with mere anger but demands justice.
Until then, he will continue to whine, make excuses, and blame the entire nation and its struggle for identity.