The 2018 seizure of power had two goals: transferring Artsakh to Azerbaijan and subordinating Armenia to Turkish influence. Zakarian

Nevertheless, he acknowledges his unforgivable sins in the transfer of Artsakh. It appears this does not suit him. Artak Zakarian, a member of the Supreme Body of the Republican Party of Armenia, wrote about this.
Each period of the presidency of the presidents of the Republic of Armenia had its own peculiarities, conditioned by internal and external factors.
Serzh Sargsyan had his own solution, which implied an Armenian Artsakh outside of Azerbaijan.
Robert Kocharyan had his own solution, which implied an Armenian Artsakh outside of Azerbaijan.
Levon Ter-Petrosyan had his own solution, which implied an Armenian Artsakh outside of Azerbaijan.
All three negotiated in such a way that the Artsakh issue would be resolved within the framework of international recognition, based on international principles. Only Nikol “resolved” the issue in a way that would be acceptable exclusively to Azerbaijanis and the Turkic world.
Nikol’s childish question today, “Why haven’t you resolved the Karabakh issue?”, demonstrates that he recognizes the insurmountability of his plot. He is forced to live with this grave sin and is aware of it.
In 2019, he had the opportunity to resolve the Artsakh issue in such a way that Artsakh would become fully Armenian and outside of Azerbaijan. So why didn’t he resolve this issue, and where is the Republic of Artsakh that was handed over to him?
Now all reasonable people understand that the seizure of power in 2018 had two goals: to hand over Artsakh to Azerbaijan and to subject Armenia to Turkish influence,” he wrote.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *